Mystery of the Missing Persian Script: A 1904 Edward VII Rupee
King Edward VII, the eldest son of Queen Victoria, ascended the British throne in 1901 following his mother's death. During his reign, Indian coinage underwent a transition, and coins bearing his portrait were issued between 1903 and 1910.
Among these, the 1904 One Rupee coin of British India is regarded as one of the most attractive silver issues of the Edwardian period. Struck in 91.7% silver, the coin weighs approximately 11.66 grams and has a diameter of about 30.5 mm. At the time, the rupee served as the primary silver currency throughout British India.
The 1904 rupee was produced at both the Calcutta and Bombay Mints. Coins struck at the Calcutta Mint were issued without a mint mark, in accordance with the mint's standard practice. In contrast, Bombay Mint specimens can be identified by a small incuse “B” beneath the crown on the reverse. Collectors also recognize Bombay issues by a tiny dot associated with the lotus-bud stem design. These subtle differences make the 1904 rupee an interesting study for numismatists, as coins from both mints share the same date but can be distinguished through careful observation.
The
obverse features a right-facing portrait of King Edward VII, engraved by George
William de Saulles. Encircling the bust is the inscription “EDWARD VII KING
& EMPEROR,” emphasizing his dual role as King of the United Kingdom and
Emperor of India. Unlike many royal portraits of the era, the king is depicted
without a crown, a characteristic feature of Edward VII's Indian coinage.
The reverse bears the inscription “ONE RUPEE INDIA 1904” in English and Persian, surrounded by an elegant floral arrangement of lotus motifs and surmounted by the Imperial Crown. The harmonious design and artistic detailing have made this rupee one of the most admired coins in the British Indian series. The coin's reeded edge was intended to discourage clipping and other forms of tampering.
During my examination of 1904 rupees, I encountered an unusual Calcutta Mint specimen that lacked the Persian inscription on the reverse. Since the missing letters represent a loss of metal, the coin weighed only 11.4 grams, noticeably below the standard weight. This raises an intriguing question regarding its origin. The absence of the Persian script may indicate a minting error, although it is also possible that the letters were deliberately removed at a later date. However, the coin does not exhibit the deep scratches, filing marks, or surface disturbances that would normally accompany such alteration. If the inscription was intentionally erased, the workmanship was remarkably careful, though such modification would significantly affect the coin's historical integrity. As a result, the true explanation behind this unusual piece remains uncertain and worthy of further investigation. Also, the obverse shows normal circulation wear, but there is no obvious indication that the coin has been heavily machined or thinned across its entire surface. On the reverse, the area where the Persian inscription should appear seems unusually smooth and featureless compared with the rest of the coin. The absence of any visible remnants of the script is noteworthy.
Comments
Post a Comment